Fathers are powerful. We know this by what happens when they are absent. Children without fathers are:

  • 5 times more likely to be poor
  • 5 times more likely to commit crime
  • 9 times more likely to drop out of school
  • 20 times more likely to go to prison

Those statistics are courtesy of former President Barack Obama, in his 2008 Father’s Day Address.

The vocation of the father is to provide, protect and establish his children. By establishment I mean that a father gives the child the gift of their own unique identity as sons and daughters. This happens through frequent affirmation, and loving correction too. The established child knows that he possesses his own destiny and has the freedom to answer to it. This is precisely why children flounder without a father.

This human relationship is taken up and fulfilled in the revelation of Jesus Christ. His definitive revelation to us is that we are in relationship with the Father. In Baptism, we are adopted into God’s family: sons of our Heavenly Father. This gives us our footing, and also the freedom to answer the unique task entrusted to us from above.

As Christians, this message is fundamental to our faith. We would do well to remember that this revelation is considered blasphemous to Muslims, as Dr. Scott Hahn reminded me at the SEEK 2017 conference last month. In a day and age in which we use words without knowing what they mean, let’s define blasphemy. Blasphemy can be defined in four ways according to Dictionary.com:

  • an impious utterance or action against God
  • an act of cursing or reviling God
  • the crime of assuming to oneself the rights or qualities of God
  • an irreverent behavior toward anything held sacred, priceless, etc.

What we hold most dear as Christians, what Jesus Christ has revealed to us about God and our very selves, is considered an impious utterance / a curse / a crime / or an irreverent behavior…

The relationship of Allah to believers is much more akin to the relationship of a master to a slave. The case is far worse for “infidels”, and for women altogether. He is the master. Believers are his slaves. Islam after all means “submission,” and Muslim means “one who submits”. Because Islam understands Allah to be absolutely transcendent, He is not bound by rationality and is not obliged to reveal himself to man at all. And this is precisely what makes the dialogue of cultures difficult (perhaps impossible) for Islam, as Pope Benedict XVI warned in his Regensburg Address in 2006.

The topic of Islam arose in a recent conversation between Bill Maher and Sam Harris  on HBO’s Real Time with Bill Maher. Maher said something deeply intriguing: “We are never going to defeat terrorism until we reform Islam. And we’ll never reform Islam if we can’t talk about it.”

I admire his intention, but the problem with this sentiment, is twofold: First, religious reform cannot happen from the outside, most especially from people so dogmatically hostile to religion, as Maher and Harris undeniably are. The second problem is even greater: Maher expects the fruit of Christianity to be operative for a religion that rests on different first principles. Dialogue and reform are possible in Christianity, precisely because we are free to co-operate with God or not. We are free on two levels: by nature and by God-given grace. Man is that unique creature in all of creation that possesses intellect and will by which he can affirm truth, do good, and contemplate beauty. But, sin clouds our intellect and weakens our will, turning freedom into a burden. For this reason, Christ came to reveal the Fatherhood of God, which re-awakens the true “freedom of the sons of God” in us (Romans 8:21). St. Paul reminds us that: “It is for freedom that Christ has set us free. Stand firm, then, and do not let yourselves be burdened again by a yoke of slavery” (Galatians 5:1). What is more: the Father bestows, through the Son, the guarantee of the Holy Spirit upon the Catholic Church so that dogma faithfully develops through history with man’s faithful co-operation.

The task for the Christian is to preserve the freedom that the Father intended from all time, and that Christ restored to us in baptism. This is only accomplished through fervent prayer and asceticism with the support of a brotherhood. But this is very different from the task of the Muslim, whose pursuit is greater submission to Allah, whose absolute transcendence may or may not bind him to rationality or the nature of man.

Fatherlessness, in all forms, is empirically devastating.

02 09 2017
Back to all articles
  • The initial irony of Maher's statement is that it assume the existence of a Christian world.

    That's often the case for opponents of religion in the Western World and the opponents of the Church in particular. Only Christianity has advanced the concept of man as a special being in inherent worth in which all are equal (under God) and all have the freedom to choose. Freedom, it should be noted, to choose good or evil, the good or the bad, nature or the unnatural.

    These concepts are so deeply ingrained in the Western world that they are now part of the secular world outlook of European peoples, of which we are one. But they only came to be the world view of Western peoples because of the Church. It's no accident that the "Western" world is the former Roman world and that notions of equality, acceptance and choice really only stem from there. That's due to the Church spreading throughout Rome. Where those ideas have carried outside of Europe, that's because Europeans carried them.

    When guys like Maher imagine an Islam that changes, they're looking through Westernized lenses. Islam's experimentation with a Hellenized Islam that saw the world more like Christians due failed and in fact became an anathema. Islam can't change as it would strike Islamic tenants about the nature of God and man down as invalid if it did. Maher regards that as possible only because, in spite of his hostility to Christianity and Catholicism, he still sees the world through the collective Catholic world view. Muslims see God as good, of course, but they also believe that God is not so much inherently good but rather that God defines what is good because he is God. That doesn't leave much, indeed any, room for trying to discern the nature of good.

    He is
    not bound by rationality and is not obliged to reveal himself to man at
    all. - See more at:
    http://thosecatholicmen.com/articles/why-christianity-can-reform-but-islam-cant/#sthash.60oT2BkX.dpuf